Max Alcala Gurri vs Carlos Sanchez Jover Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison

Predictions insights for the upcoming tennis match:

1. Second serve performance analysis: In the past six months, Jover has exhibited an exceptional second serve performance, triumphing in 49.38% of points, while Gurri has achieved a commendable 45.02% success rate. It is worth noting that there exists a significant correlation between this statistic and the accuracy of match predictions.
2. Return game statistics examination: Recent return game statistics reveal that Jover, in splendid form, has conquered 55.41% of their opponents' second serve points, whereas Gurri has showcased exemplary skills by securing victory in 55.65% of these points. The same can be observed in the first serve returns, with Jover achieving a rate of 40.95% compared to Gurri's 39.78%. Undeniably, this data proves invaluable in determining the favored player in this head-to-head clash.
3. Under pressure assessment: Jover has demonstrated an impressive ability to save breakpoints, successfully defending 61.82% of them in recent matches. On the other hand, Gurri has exhibited a slightly lower rate of 51.58%. Such statistics prove to be crucial for making predictions during in-game betting scenarios.
4. Performance overview: In the past year, Jover has triumphed in a remarkable 70.37% of the matches played, boasting a win/loss record of 57/24. In comparison, Gurri's performance has been commendable as well, with a win rate of 65.82% (W/L 52/27). Consequently, we gain a comprehensive overview of the head-to-head prediction between these two players.
5. Optimal playing surface: Jover has showcased their greatest career surface dominance on the clay court, triumphing in an impressive 64% of matches (W/L 277/156). Conversely, their performance on indoor hard courts has been less satisfactory, with a win rate of 0% (W/L 0/1). Similarly, Gurri has experienced the highest success rate on clay, winning 61% of matches (W/L 183/116). On the contrary, their performance on hard courts has been less favorable, garnering a meager win rate of 29% (W/L 5/12).
6. Player level analysis: In the previous year, Jover predominantly competed in the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments with a prize of $10K, emerging victorious in a remarkable 83.05% of matches (W/L 49/10). Conversely, Gurri has primarily participated in the same tournaments, achieving a commendable win rate of 71.19% (W/L 42/17). It is essential to consider the disparity in event levels when comparing player statistics to make accurate predictions regarding the favorite.
7. Direct head-to-head matches: Thus far, Jover and Gurri have crossed paths once, with Jover emerging triumphant on that occasion. Jover has won 2 sets out of the 3 played, solidifying their dominance over Gurri. Their last encounter took place at the M15 Girona on 21-10-2021, on a clay court, resulting in Jover's victory with a score of 3-6, 6-3, 6-2.
8. Head-to-head match duration: Previous head-to-head matches between these players have encompassed an average match time of 2 hours, 31 minutes, and 0 seconds.
9. Predicting the outcome of deciding sets: Jover and Gurri have engaged in a single deciding set, with Jover emerging victorious. Such information proves to be highly useful in forecasting the outcome should this match extend to a fifth set.
10. Head-to-head extreme pressure situations: Astonishingly, Jover and Gurri have not encountered any tiebreaks in their previous encounters.
11. Opponent quality considerations: Over the last 12 months, Jover has faced opponents with an average rank of 387.09. In comparison, Gurri has squared off against players with an average rank of 386.27.
12. Deciding set performance against all players: In the past year, when matches proceed to a deciding set, Jover has shown exceptional prowess, triumphing in 71% of such matches. Conversely, Gurri has achieved a respectable 52% win rate in all matches played on the professional tour. These statistics prove invaluable for live predictions and betting during deciding sets.
13. Current event head-to-head statistics: While analyzing tennis matches, past player performance serves as a fundamental indicator. However, once a tournament is underway, it becomes crucial to examine the current event statistics, offering insights into the form of players. Therefore, it is advisable to review the statistics provided in the section below (assuming the players have participated in the ongoing event). Additionally, some players may exhibit enhanced performance at specific tournaments, a factor that should be considered while determining the likely outcome.
14. Break point conversion rate: In recent matches, Jover has splendidly converted 48.02% of breakpoint opportunities, whereas Gurri has exhibited a conversion rate of 44.74%, indicating their efficiency in capitalizing on chances to break their opponents' serve. These statistics are highly significant when engaging in in-game live betting and seeking valuable tips.
15. If you are seeking predictive tennis models, this article shall serve as an excellent starting point. (Warning: Limited to stats enthusiasts)